A libel lawyer tells how he changed his mind Neptune Actress Amber Heard is facing charges in her case with Johnny Depp.
Aaron Mink tell entertainment website Joeyjust days before the end of the trial, he will say there is a “zero or less than one percent” chance that Hurd could face charges for anything she said in the stands.
But things changed as the case progressed.
For more celebrity-related news and videos, check out celebrity >>
Watch in the video above: Defamation lawyer Aaron Minc’s ‘lies’ about Amber Heard
“I think as the case progresses, we start to see more and more objective evidence that she lied about things under oath, and that’s when it starts to cross the line, she’s probably fabricating evidence, fabricating photos, fabricating bruises, Alter evidence and submit it,” he said, adding that falsifying evidence was “very serious” and “very offensive” to the justice system.
Expert witness Brian Newmeister, called by Depp’s legal team, gave testimony explaining the data in Heard’s photo, which was allegedly injured as a result of Depp’s abuse.
Neumeister testified that he did not comment on whether the photos were intentionally altered. He told the court that he checked the EXIF data and that the image files could be exchanged.
Neumeister looked at three different photos used as evidence in the case, which he said looked the same but were actually different sizes.
“The photos don’t digitally fingerprint each other. In other words, forensically, they don’t match,” Neumeister said.
The metadata for the photos indicated they passed through Apple’s “Photos 3.0” app, Neumeister said.
After cross-examination, Hurd’s attorney pointed out that Neumeister did not have a degree or certificate in computer science. Her legal team also noted that Photos is software that also acts as a “photo sorter” to save photos.
Minc said he hoped prosecutors would “look at” the case “because if there was very clear evidence that she did, then [prosecution] Of course it should be considered,” he said.
He did not say there was any “hard evidence or evidence” that Hurd had fabricated the evidence, but “if it turns out to be the case, and there are certainly questions raised at the trial right now, it could lead to criminal prosecution and jail time”.
Leading lawyers predict who will win Johnny Depp v Amber Heard
Meanwhile, a former Los Angeles district attorney shares her thoughts on who will win the high-profile case.
As the jury prepares to continue its deliberations when it opens on May 31, attorney Emily D. Baker shares her thoughts on the verdict.
The legal expert commented on every minute of her “extremely wild” trial over the past six weeks. YouTube channel.
Watch in the video above: Depp’s highlights, hear closing arguments
In a recent podcast, Baker said she went to trial believing that neither Depp nor Heard would win the case.
“I came in thinking that was the most likely [that they would both lose],”She’s at neither thin nor fat podcast.
However, she said she could now see Depp’s path to winning the case based on a key detail in Amber Heard’s testimony.
During her time in the stands, Hurd confirmed she retweeted Washington post Review article written by her. Given that her retweet contained the title Depp claimed to be defamatory, Baker believes it gave Depp an edge in his case.
“The title is ‘Opinion Amber Heard: ‘I talk about sexual violence and confront the anger of our culture.’ This has to change,” she continued.
“Her team has been arguing that she didn’t write the headline. Depp’s team is still arguing that even though she didn’t write the headline, she retweeted it and said, “Today I published this in the Washington Post, It tells the story of women who turned their anger over violence and inequality into political power, despite the cost. forward. ‘
“So it had the headline, and she said ‘I wrote this’. So I think this tweet is their strongest case right now, because she said ‘I wrote this’ and she said ‘I wrote this, Include title”.
“If they find the allegations to be untrue, or they don’t believe them, or they can’t believe them enough to say it’s not defamation, then those are the ones that matter most to him.”
Baker detailed her thoughts on the verdict on a YouTube livestream after the court heard closing arguments.
“I think what’s going to happen? If we see Johnny Depp winning, what we’re going to see is a retweet. Legally, that’s the clearest path for him to win,” she said.
“I’m not a thoughtful juror. I also have information from the internet about the case, which is unsubstantiated.
“But if Johnny Depp wins, I think it’s on the tweet. At the beginning of this case, I didn’t think there was a path to victory. Law and editorial didn’t work for me. I was like, ‘This is will be very, very difficult. “
“Law and columns are not math. After watching the six weeks of the trial, I can see why they chose to take the trial, and I see Johnny Depp has the potential to win.
“I think it’s a huge win for them because that’s not where I was at the beginning of this case.”