Brian Cox to be remembered for his performance as Hannibal Lecter

41 years ago Thomas Harris In his classic 1981 novel, the world of terrifying psychiatrist turned cannibal serial killer Hannibal Lecter was unleashed Red Dragon, and since then he has developed into the most iconic villain in all of fiction.his image by Anthony Hopkins in the 1991 movie The Silence of the Lambs making him one of the big villains on the screen, while Mads MickelsonSame great performance in Cult Favourites Hannibal The same goes for TV. With two legendary portrayals of the character, it’s no surprise that his debut sank into the abyss of obscurity, relegated to an amusing side note, while his successor continues to garner accolades.The problematic performance is Brian Cox in the 1986 movie hunter, a sadly overlooked description, should be better than getting lost in the shadows of subsequent descriptions. Cox’s performance offers a unique version of the character that not only shares the limelight with Hopkins and Mickelson, but is long overdue for the recognition it deserves.

Collider video of the day

related: How to Watch Hannibal Lecter Movies and Shows in Order (Chronological Order and Release Dates)

hunter It’s a movie full of overlooked elements.From its stylized cinematography (whose unique use of color tells us more about the emotion of a scene than words), to William PetersonGreat performance as FBI agent Will Graham, a character who constantly oscillates between hero and villain, Michael Mannof The adaptation of Harris’ novel remains one of the greatest depictions of his work. The film closely follows the source material and follows Graham hunting down a serial killer known as the Tooth Fairy (Tom Noonan). To do this, he enlists the help of Hannibal Lecktor (the first of many spelling changes), an imprisoned killer Graham helps capture in an event that deeply traumatizes him. The novel was adapted again under the original name in 2002, with Hopkins playing the character of Lecter, a decision that proved helpful when comparing two different portrayals of the same character. While it might seem silly to compare anything to one of the most iconic performances in all of cinema, Cox is portraying far more than one might think.

First, he’s a much less likeable character. It might sound odd when discussing a massacre, but Cox’s version completely lacks the politeness of the character’s other depictions. Both Hopkins and Mickelson bring a delightful and almost seductive quality to the character, allowing them to penetrate deep into someone’s mind and commit the most heinous crimes imaginable. If the characters they play can convince someone to cut off their own face with just words, Cox’s portrayal would make people do so so they don’t have to hear him again. He was arrogant, rude, aggressively conceited. During his first meeting with Graham, he seemed bored by the whole encounter, only cheering up when Graham mentioned that he had read an article written by Lecktor.

While he agreed to look at the files on the recent killings, he did so only after confronting Graham in a way that would push even the coolest of men to violence. Graham has every right to shut the cell door in his presence and never see him again, but he still gave Lecto what he wanted, revealing what his successor lacked for Cox Delicately portrayed. He may look like he’s only half-heard, but the truth is much more complicated. It’s a character who is always plotting, and no situation will end in any way other than his intentions. His ability to get everything he wants without anyone realizing it is terrifying and carries over to the scariest aspects of his portrayal.

While other versions of Lecter have distinct theatrical elements to them, dancing on the fine line between horror and comedy, Cox is firmly rooted in reality. With his eloquent vocabulary and amiable demeanor, Hopkins keeps forcing someone to eat his own brain while classical music plays in the background, a terrifying character who is sure to haunt every unfortunate person who meets him man’s nightmare, but that’s all he is. a character. Its lavish characterization seems tailor-made for the big screen, but is too exaggerated to imagine it actually exists. Meanwhile, Cox opted for a more restrained performance, and the result was the scariest real-life version of Hannibal Lecter ever. Gone is the over-the-top demeanor, replaced by an outspoken, down-to-earth character who bears a striking resemblance to a real-life killer.

Given Lecktor’s almost mythical status, it might be disappointing to learn that the notorious killer is more of a nasty next-door neighbor than the dramatic killer his reputation suggests, but it’s the kind of The contrast made him so scary. One of the scariest things in the world is how the most normal people commit the most vile crimes, and some of the worst people in history are also some of the most charismatic and charismatic people you’ll ever meet. Cox capitalized on that feeling perfectly, and you often find yourself forgetting that he’s not just another white-collar criminal, it’s just that the truth comes to you as Graham recounts the unimaginable crimes he committed . This restraint also extends to his presentation, with all of his scenes taking place in a pure white cell, a far cry from Hopkins’ version of the stylized ones. It gave the character a strange worldliness, as if in this hellish world Harris had created, the criminals of his nature were just normal people. If future versions of Lecter seem to be designed to appeal to horror lovers looking for their next thrill, Cox’s version looks like a true crime documentary about two houses everyone thinks is just the other. The man in – there’s nothing scarier than that.

By the 2002 edition Red Dragon By the time it was released in theaters, Hopkins had already played the role twice (one of which earned him an Academy Award for Best Actor).So his role is greatly expanded compared to both hunter And the original novel, hoping to capitalize on the success of the already legendary show. Numerous additional scenes were created detailing Lecter’s relationship with the Tooth Fairy, and a new prologue was created that revealed how Graham captured Lecter in the first place. While these additions are intriguing, the added screen time takes away from the mystery that made him such a fascinating character in previous releases.

Meanwhile, Cox’s character is steeped in mystery and only appears in a handful of scenes during the film’s two-hour runtime. We never see him do anything other than confront everyone who walks past his cell, and his string of crimes exists only in the shadows, as if they were too evil to even talk about. Ironically, Lecktor’s cell is unshaded and the cameras aren’t trying to hide the deranged killer. Instead, the mystery comes entirely from Cox’s performance, who gives the impression of a character burdened with decades of crime entirely from his own way of writing. It’s impressive how Lecto managed to have such a big impact on the film, even though he never left his cell, and his minimal screentime seems to have been edited to within an inch of his life, Only adds to that feeling. What we don’t see is always scarier than what we see, and Cox’s portrayal is a perfect example.

Anthony Hopkins’ Hannibal Lecter is one of the most famous performances in all of movies, and for good reason.Since his first appearance, he has Jodie FosterThe Clarice Starling approaches his cell like he’s been waiting for her all his life, and you know you’re in for a show like no other. By contrast, Mads Mikkelsen’s Turn plays more of the character’s seductive qualities, seeing him as someone who can slip into the darkest corners of your psyche while convincing you that’s exactly what you want. Brian Cox didn’t do that either, opting instead for a more nuanced performance without any of the drama of his successor.

This may seem a bit simplistic by comparison, and considering that Hopkins and Mickelson have become synonymous with the character, it’s understandable that Cox’s performance is more difficult to accept for contemporary audiences because they have Get used to the more “traditional” version of the character. But Cox’s down-to-earth approach gives him a authenticity that all other versions lack, making him the scariest Hannibal Lecter to date. It’s a testament to the fact that three actors can bring such different flavors to the same character, and while two of the most famous Lecters will continue to receive the credit they deserve for years to come, let’s not forget that Brian Cox is equally impressive Impressive portrayal of people.


Every Hannibal Lecter movie and TV show from worst to best

Read next